Is it “live” a dealer that doesn't exist?

Live Casino Digital Dealers: Can a game where the dealer is not human really be “live”?

AI-generated dealers reopen the debate about what can be called “live” gaming.

To answer it, at least as I see it, it is necessary to get out of the language of marketing and get stricter with words. And if we do, the conclusion is clear: if the dealer is not a person, that is not a "live" game. Instead, it is a real-time simulation that stretches the original concept until empty.

Now, in the midst of such a large market, it is not always easy to address this problem. However, I believe that to understand it we must go back to the most basic: what is a live casino in the mind of any player .

Since they appeared live casinos, the interest of users has been concentrated in the same human presence, manual shuffling and broadcasting from a real setting . It is in that 'imperfection' of our condition where authenticity is found, our best friend in the game.

But when digital live casino dealers arrive, that logic is uprooted. Although we see them super similar to us, the integration of figures generated by AI and MetaHuman technology works only as an imitation of the traditional table , but it never manages to encompass the experience that is only achieved in interaction between humans.

I'm not saying it's a bad experience, but without a doubt, not what is expected of the "live" concept.

He streaming with real dealers vs. live casino with RNG: The key to its technical difference

It is no secret that there are many platforms that today use the live casino with RNG with the intention of imitating a streaming and, as I already mentioned, they put it under the live casino category. And although it may sound similar, the truth is that there is a technical gap , and the difference with the live casino with digital dealers is fundamental:

• In the real live casino chance will depend entirely on the physics of the cards and human management.
• For its part, in the "live" with dealers created by AI the result is determined with a Random Number Generator (RNG) , very similar to that of slot machines.

Now, taking into account the above, it would not be fair to forget that many companies like Avanti Studios They use digital dealers to achieve an exciting level of technical innovation. But that's the core of the problem: For me the issue is not doubting progress , but to ask myself if it is really valid to mix a hyperrealistic algorithm with the concept of a physical table.

What it all boils down to is that when a user takes the time and money to enjoy the immediacy of real human interaction in a live blackjack table Ireland and he meets a clone created with codes, really you are consuming a conceptually different product and user experience and in which even the result is given in a different way: it depends on the machine, not on human nature.

The most curious thing about this matter is that currently There is no rule that requires clarification if the dealer's heart is beating or if it is a render .

Transparency in online casinos matters more than you think: The player must know what they are getting into

I do not want to leave any chiaroscuro in this matter: when we talk about brands like Bwin, Luckia or PartyCasino we are talking about companies that operate under an impeccable legal framework and with audited certifications. In that sense, the intention is not to sow suspicions, but to highlight the need for a commitment to explain to the player what they are really buying.

Just as it happens when we analyze the nitty-gritty of RTP either the windowless architecture of traditional rooms, the focus always must be about selling a transparent product . Eye! This is not about stopping innovation, but simply calling a spade a spade to protect user trust.

Within the regulated market, credibility is key and transparent labeling is a great way to reinforce it. With it, in addition to being reliable for the user, ambiguity sanctions are avoided that eventually arise when the user discovers the technology behind the screen.

AI casino games that demand greater responsibility from the sector

Almost all markets have been adapting to technological development, and the arrival of AI in casino games is a great example of this; It is, so to speak, a natural evolution in the search for more immersive environments.

In graphic terms, the avatars are almost perfect : They don't get tired, they don't make mistakes, they eliminate queues at the tables and they personalize the game to the taste of each user. As a technological product they are impeccable.

For many, This advance represents a bridge towards the use of generative AI in the sector : In time we will see a dealer who can process the context of a table at Instante, speak to each player in their native language, adapt conversational tone or modulate their personality.

But again: the problem has never been technology, but rather commercial language . Nowadays, these important advances are disguised as 'business as usual', which, in addition to confusing the user, reflects the market's lack of confidence in the product. If a new way of playing has been created, the logical thing is to also create its own category.

The pioneering projects of Ireland digital croupiers are a good reflection that the market is ready to take this step, but always based on basic pedagogy: explain to the user what is behind the screen, without much embellishment . This way the transition is easier for everyone.

In short, selling an algorithm dressed as a human under the label of digital live casino dealers subtracts all the value from this technical advance and does not allow it to shine with its own light. Besides, hides the nature of the real dealer and takes away its transparency and authenticity . The digital dealer is extremely efficient, but only if it is marketed with the precise denomination.

Share article X.com LinkedIn Facebook

What do you think? Join the conversation!

Cancel reply